Should Our Youth Get Paid For Their Exceptional Athletic Abilities?

derrickboazman 200x200 Should Our Youth Get Paid For Their Exceptional Athletic Abilities?

Listen To ” Too Much Truth” Every Week Day From 4pm-7pm Eastern Standard Time On News And Talk 1380 AM…

You can also listen live on the internet at www.

Hotline/ Call In number is (404) 892-2703

Just Click On More To Hear What Derrick Is Talking About….

  • mrmrpolo

    If the Dems advocate taxing the”rich” so often, why is it they rarely mention the fact that so many of THEM are part of the ated “rich”?!!Much love

  • S. El

    Revised: 16th day of November, 2009
    Ex Rel means an ex-relationship regarding information, associated with the straw construct of the birth certificate nomen (name). It can ONLY be presented or argued by either the Attorney General or one who is of a Natural Status (In Propria Persona), a Flesh and Blood Natural Being, which means one would HAVE to be in their Natural Status, one who has Declared thneir Nationality. This brings life to the Prophetic Statement by Noble Drew Ali, wherein, he said “If you don’t do anything else, Declare your Nationality.”, since he had already Proclaimed it for the Nation. After doing so, you can begin to fight these insubordinate Constructs, and violations made against you, which are outside of the Law. Presenting Ex Rel DOES NOT void your Proper Natural / National, Flesh and Blood Status! The Natural / In Propria Persona Status presentment in Court, is the only condition wherein you can present or argue Ex Rel of the Straw-man, because it (the straw) in itself cannot present or argue for itself, because it (the straw) is a corporate construct on paper, it is a Corporate Person — it is not a Natural Person, not a Natural Flesh and Blood being. It is a fiction that cannot speak for itself. Frankly, if you don’t speak for it, they will, and that is exactly what they have been doing. Ex Rel IS the Lawful Remedy (NO DOUBT) to refrain them from using it against you in the Court.
    In a Court of Law everything is based on Information. Hence: Verbal exchanges (Speaking), Answers, Submission of Documents or Writs (Affidavits of Fact) which express or impart information, and Writs of Discovery, which ask questions that are in need of being Answered by the Court before the court can lawfully proceed. And lastly the “Sentence”, grammatical phrase applied to information, whether written or spoken. Contempt of Court, usually based on what you say and do (or don’t say or do) and how you say it, or do it. Not to say they (Demos) necessarily has respect for these facts, because in reality they have contempt for you before you even get there. However, it is incumbent upon us all to enforce the Law. And, at this time especially, to eradicate the already falling institution of lies and deceit of the psuedo court rooms, and of the Law, as well to protect ourselves and teach our babies of the coming generations, how to do the same. Our BIGGEST WEAPON is the Truth (information), and the concern for us is the method in getting the Truth to the masses, of which Newspapers, Radio, World Wide Web (www Internet, Television Media, Classes, etc., is, at this time, the venue(s) for doing so.
    The purpose or point of information exchange in the courtroom is for them (the court(s) of public opinion and lawful authority) to bring what is supposed to be justice or remedy to the Body standing before it, whether that Body is presented as Flesh and Blood or re-presented as a Straw. (Of course the straw has limited justice and remedy, as it has privileges–not Rights, thus it plays into the “Color” game of “Color-Of Law” [a semblance of Law–not the real] for “Colored” People. The information that comes across leads to the sentencing (words, information). There is supposed to be an injured party, that you have injured, before you get there. However, usually it is not present, because they usually base their injury on fictitious corporations that don’t speak and can’t speak. Then they tell you, you have made some injury to “Santa Claus”, which is a fiction that can’t be injured. This is one of the ways they have usurped and corrupted the “Justice system”. With knowledge of the difference between a FLesh and Blood Natural Being, and a Fiction Corporate Person, Ex Rel is effective, as it admits to having information in regards to that fiction that cannot speak for itself. It makes you the Authorized Representative properly, without bonds, ties or contracts. That fiction has been what you have been saying is you, therefore allowing your being to take the hit for fictitious charges on a fictitious entity. Ex Rel is, by its very definition, in regards to information, and it is the lawful remedy regarding any information associated with the Straw. Ex Rel is how you lawfully “stop” them from using the straw against you, therefore they must address you in your Proper Status. Being in your proper status is the only condition that can present Ex Rel. Coming in Proper Status, as a National, Moorish National, supersedes their corporate jurisdiction. A National is the highest ranking “citizen”, who is attached to the land aboriginal and indigenous, not to the States / Corporations. The States / Corporations are foreigners. Nationals are not foreigners, and can never be foreigners in their own land, therefore we ought not ever address ourselves as foreigners. We address them as foreigners. (See Chapter 47 of the Circle 7 Koran). As a National, and when operating under proper Protocols, you have Consuls and Ministers who can speak on your behalf (See Article III, section 2 and 3 of the Constitution). Therefore, Consuls and Ministers must be in place for a Nation. They are “Amicus Curae”, meaning they enter the Court as friends of the Court. However, they cannot be friends of a Court that has no Jurisdiciton and Authority. Unity is Nationhood. What we need to do as a Nation is educate the people (those who resonate to) being Consuls and Ministers. While that is being done, you, yourself can Ex Rel the Straw. Now that is just the truth regarding it, and your relationship to it, which is Ex Relatione (Ex Rel). Failure to present Ex Rel, allows the state corporations to act as Power Of Attorney over the Straw.
    The State Corporations have been acting as Power of Attorney over the straw, and speaking for it, because someone must. Those who have answered to it have agreed to be the straw, the fiction, and a fiction cannot speak for itself, hence, they push Attorneys on you to speak for you. Therefore you must approach it from your Proper Natural Being Status. In Law terms it is “In Propria Persona”. It is time, rather past time, for us to get into Proper Status, and take the position of Power Of Attorney over the Straw. This does not mean you own it, or that it is you. Having this Proper Lawful understanding clears up the mis-concept that one can “capture it”, copyright it, Sue people for using it, etc. You can Sue one for addressing YOU incorrectly in Lawful matters. Essentially that is what Ex Rel puts in order, as you must first Ex Rel the straw, and say “I am”…… You cannot own that straw construct, because you did not construct it, and it is not you. As well you cannot Dissolve it because it was not constructed by you, and it is not a contract. It is a negotiable instrument, of which the Straw is derived.
    “It” (the Straw) is not a Natural Person, or a Natural Being — never was. Nor does it represent in anyway, you as a Flesh and Blood Being. It is not a She, it is not a He, it is a corporate construct on paper, that you have been told, and have agreed is you. Just because your Mother and Father named you, they still allowed you to be encapsulated as a straw construct, with that instrument (birth certificate) of negotiation used for, and essentially against, the child. Some are complete with footprints, on a piece of paper with their (state’s) corporate seal, as a mark of authentic ownership, and with your child’s footprints stamped and branded as a quasi-consenting seal. Fresh merchandise from the dock, delivered by the doctor, and counted as merchandise of the corporation. You had no knowledge of the intent, or the adhesions that come with this instrument; as with a contract, even one you consciously made, the moment you find it has adhesions, hidden or non-disclosed purposes, obligations and intent; it becomes immediately VOID. It is not voidable, it is VOID. That is the Law of Contracts.
    It is important and necessary to address the use of the straw instrument as a tool for Power Of Attorney over you, and your child—the Natural Flesh and Blood Being. You must disclaim the Power of Attorney, essentially that is what is operating and working against you, and that is what Ex Rel remedies. If you don’t disclaim it, or rebut it, (which must be done in Proper Status, thus you must declare your Natural / National Status first), then you cannot make the presentment or argument, and they will continue to act as Power Of Attorney over that construct, and over you. This is why they established the constructs in the first place, so they can create negotiable instruments, place burdens, debts and obligations on your behalf, without your knowledge of it.
    Let’s clear up “Argument”. Argument is only utilized here when you are in a situation where they try to stop you from using Ex Rel, as if they don’t know what it is. Maybe they don’t. Yet, is not your job to school them, certainly not to suffer at their hands because of thier lack, as they are ‘deemed to know Law.
    Owen v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622
    “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law.”

    They attempt to hinder you because; 1. most of these quais-courts are not used to hearing you present law. 2. They want you to remain on their course of capturing you and having jurisdiction over you, as that is how they keep bread and butter on their plate, whic goes against their duties to uphold the law, and protect the unalienable rights of the people. Obviously they are contrary to their sworn obligations.
    Argument: In rhetoric and logic, an inference drawn from premises, the truth of which is indisputable, or at least highly probable.
    The first straw that was created was the negro, colored, black, etc. Since we did not buck about that, they got better at effectuating their intent. They speak for us through these straw constructs, as a negro, colored, black, etc. Anyone who accepts labels, has only privileges, they do not have Rights. Someone needs to speak for them. This is what an Attorney is. He is an Officer of the Court, who brings you to the Court and Leaves you there. Thus the Court immediately has Leave (Jurisdiction) over you. Attorneys are Bounty Hunters with a Suit and tie on. The definition of the Lawful term “In Propria Persona” (In Proper Person-Status) is as follows:
    In Propria Persona: In one’s own proper person. It was formerly a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the jurisdiction.
    Let us not get confused, or allow anyone to confuse us with the difference of Natural Person and Corporate Person, or Flesh and Blood Being, In Full Life, of which we are that from the moment of birth, a spiritual being, manifested in the flesh. However, in Law, there are two types of “Persons”. The Natural (Flesh and Blood) and the Corporate Person (fiction). So it is important to know when one is saying Person, which one they are speaking of. When one is being highly spiritual, they identify themselves In Full Life, Flesh and Blood, a Natural Being, which in Court would be a Natural Person, as opposed to a Corporate Person. One who is “In Propria Persona”, sets the stage for who has jurisdiction, if any, over the Person (Personum Jurisdiction).
    This is a well oiled wheel, however upon knowing the logistics and components of it, you can navigate through it, around it, and out of it. If you do not correct your status then you cannot make these presentments regarding Ex Rel, and defend your natural existence as a Flesh and Blood Being. It is erroneously in reverse, because the Proper Natural Status or Natural Being (You) is seen under the lawful term as “Civil Liter Mortus”, (dead in the eyes of the Law), because of his failure to speak for himself in his Proper status. Essentially many of the arguments brought to the Court are a Straw in themselves (dead issues). So a straw is more than just the name on the birth certificate, created as a tool or instrument that robs the natural and unalienable rights (birthrights) of the child. Once you have declared that you are in your Proper Status, essentially you are able to take Power of Attorney over these instruments, and matters, and be the “authorized Representatiave for the Straw, without voiding your Proper Status, and without owning or being the corporate construct; instead of continuing to allow the corporate states to be the authorized representative who works against you, seeing you as collateral, and who acts as Power of Attorney speaking on your behalf. You must be the Authorized Representative of the straw, so that they are not. Authorized means permission, directive, possessed of legal or rightful power. Representative is one who stands in the place of another. They are calling the birth certificated construct (paper) to the forum (which cannot speak). You are well aware that it cannot present itself, nor can it re-present. Thus you need to have an Attorney to speak for you. Thus, you represent it, but it is not you, and you are not it. You are a flesh and blood being “In Full Life, and you are not “Civil Liter Mortus”. The definition of “Civil Liter Mortus” and “In Full Life”, are as follows:
    Civil Liter Mortus: Civilly dead; dead in the view of the law. The condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities, and is accounted dead in law.

  • S. El

    Act of responding,
    An answer.
    quality or state of being able;
    power to perform, whether physical, moral, intellectual, or legal;
    capacity, skill or competence; sufficiency of power, skill, etc.
    the obligation to answer for an act done, and to repair any injury it may have caused.

    The Abilities and Re-sponsibilities of Moors
    Moors have Obligations to each other, and others have obligations to Moors. Moors have a responsibility to the World, as demonstrated during (but not limited to) the era when civilization flourished as a result of their contributions and influences in Europe. Europe was originally inhabited by Moors, and was named Europa after Queen Europa, a Moorish Sister. Europe was a designation point where they (Caucasians) were taken to for a more suitable climate, and to “rope them in”, hence Eu-ropa. People were named after their accomplishments, and places were named after people and their accomplishments, to be recorded in heritage and history, just as the Roman General John Ciprius Afrikana, was named after his conquering and colonizing of Africa, the land that had already been divided by the Atlantic Ocean (Atlantis), along the East Coast which is where Lemuria (French Le= the, as in the Muurs, or Land of the Muurs) was /is located. That division is clearly noted on the map, upon looking at South America and Africa, it fits like a puzzle. Now we know why Tarzan was in the jungle with Africans, yet swinging along the Amazon River, which is located in South America. Now we also know why the Olmec heads (unequivocally African features), were dug up in South America. Anyone who continues to hold on to the lie that we only came here by way of slave boats, are making a clear contradiction to: 1.) their claim that we are the Mothers and Fathers of Civilization, and; 2.) that they themselves are not agents for the lie.
    The Caucasoid Mountains was named after the scientist Yaqub KauKasus Kushitus, thus Caucasians. In the mountain caves (as in cave-men, or cave dwellers), they could avoid the rays of the Sun, as many died from skin cancer (leprosy). The on-going education and welfare of the “Modern-Man” was on the shoulders of those who created (grafted) them.
    . Moors established Universities which to this day offer a pristine education. When the Moors entered or re-entered Spain (711 A.D.), it was for the purpose of civilizing — not conquering. “Students flocked from France, Germany and England to drink from the fountain of learning, which flowed only in the cities of the Moors.” When Moors left Spain, the Dark Ages (a period of social decline) ensued, or returned, leaving Modern-Man to fend for themselves. The “Dark Ages were not referring to Moors. Those who Moors civilized, and gave a basis of education, as a matter of obligation and responsibility, eventually became known as the Colonist. A colonist is one who essentially leeches off of another, including the land, resources, etc. Unfortunately, due to their desire to have the power and control, and their inability to survive and flourish (as was when the Moors left Spain and Spain degraded into beggars, friars, and bandits; and due to their desire to be ‘free’ and sovereign), they began a mission of conquering and colonizing the World, by any means necessary. Their intent is described in the “Bull Inter Cataera Divina” (a Writ, or Bulletin that describes what they call a divine purpose and intervention, although it was / is not based in Divine principles, as it’s directives state the following:
    …To plunder the New World of its treasures was acceptable because it was populated by pagans. To Christianize the pagans was necessary because it was part of God’s plan; to kill them was right because they were Satan’s or Antichrist’s warriors ..
    There is no escaping Moors responsibility to “Frankenstein”, thus the Treaty of Peace and Friendship is one agreement that outlines some of those responsibilities, and is to be attached to the Constitution as valid against the Constitution, as is the Confederation (See Article VI of the Constitution for the United States of North America, Republic). The Constitution is an ongoing agreement to prior agreements. Many think the Constitution voids any previous agreements. If that were the case Article VI would not have been written, and those who sit in the seats of government right now, wouldn’t take an Oath to it, as it is where anyone who sits in the seats of government derive their authority from. As for the Confederation, if you trace that back you will see, it too is based in Divine Principles, and the Confederation was those of the aboriginal people, wherein Confederations include a group or conglomeration of people, or a political jurisdiction of people. The Treaty had to be written as a matter of responsibility for those who came here causing discord. Some of us, did not want to Treat with them, and we were at odds with each other. However, that is like your brothers and sisters disagreeing, and doing something against your preference. This does not mean they are not still your brother or your sister. The Treaty of Peace and Friendship, surely exist although denied not only by the occupying European Colonists, for obvious usurping reasons, but is also denied by the descendants of those who authorized it, which is one of the greater points and purpose of this writing. Some unconscious Moors continue to claim to be descendants of negros, coloreds, blacks, African-Americans, etc., from a position that they think is lawful, yet it is not. Some make these claims anyway out of ignorance. In truth it places them outside of the Law, outside of the Constitutional Fold of Government, outside of the Ancient principles they say resides within them; and outside of the human family. They are then the out-laws and don’t seem to recognize those “branded” names are not with standing, as well they don’t seem to acknowledge that they are in dishonor of their foremothers and forefathers.
    It is way past time to stop claiming those brands. There is NO SUCH thing as Ancient Black People. Black is however, a description, it is not an identity. Because we are very comfortable with using it, we think it is the only way to commmunicate with each other, in a manner in which we can understand or accept. This goes against the logic, certainly for any leader, guide, sholar or teacher, because their duty and mission is to tell the people the truth, and guide them into “right knowledge”, not give them what feels good or comfortable to satisfy their emotions. This is not about their emotions, it is about the facts. The people are able to grasp what is being said to them, especially after they learn words, and how to read. After all, they are the descendants of the ones who taught the principles of civilization; the 7 Liberal Arts. A child can understand that he is not black. In his innocence he would say: “Mommy if I were black, I would look like my black shoe”. Therefore, to say that the people won’t understand is an insult to the people, or an excuse. Thus one who tries to support such, may be an Agent, at the very least, a Morisco from time past.
    What the people, particularly the youth, are fed up with, is being called something different every 20 to 30 years. A thinking mind of a child can see that confusion exist. At the very least, the variety of psuedo identities, supposedly for the collective, causes dis-unity for the child as they grow up. This is partly why there is so much discord amongst each other regarding who we are. Without serious studies, and without having the keys, one will not be able to know, nor will they be able to guide anyone else. Again, this is ripe ground for Agents, or one with the Morisco spirit, he or she is one in the same.
    . .
    Most of us certainly feel the pain of the conquest intent, and most of us say we wish to do something about it, to be in the struggle for change. However, continuing to call each other “Black People”, and to fight for rights for “Black” people is really a hypocrisy, and gets us no closer to resolution. BLACK PEOPLE HAVE NO RIGHTS! because it identifies one as being outside of the human family. All trust is placed upon one’s foremothers and forefathers.
    The Truth is not comfortable for most. As Drew Ali said “The Nations don’t want the Truth because it is too stern”. Our own actions, or lack of action, keeps us from being responsible to ourselves, to our children and to others. Ignorance of these facts do not make them an untruth, nor will the truth pass away. (Seek ye’ the truth, and all else will come unto you).
    The Treaty, (Constitution) was established after the Colonist came here and committed murder, mayhem and treason in this, the land of “Milk and Honey” (Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America). Take note that the treaty was written after the “Declaration of Independence of 1776, wherein the colonist were determined to be treated equally, (because they were not being treated equally). It is interesting to note how today, they try to act as if they never heard of Moors, yet the Treaty was written, and is a document of American History, as is the letter from George Washington to the Sultan (attached below). The Treaty was written to bring about peace, and to provide protection to them (the Colonist) on the high seas, and on the Land. Thus, the banner they were to hail for acknowledgment of them was/is the “Star Spangled Banner”, just as most of us were taught via the song, in school. It is the Banner of Peace and Amity, or of commerce, which allowed them (Colonist) to do trade/commerce. They now call it the American flag, but it is what it’s origins state; the Star Spangled Banner — not star spangled flag. Because we don’t stand up, or speak out, others (who have an obligation to us) have done what they will to, with no rebuttals, no recourse or remedy.
    The Battle of Gettysburg is one of the bloodiest battles fought here, and the graves are filled with Moors (take a trip there and see for yourself). The irony of the south fighting the North for freedom, or not, is that the Battle was fought on the real property of what they call a free slave in their modern documentaries, however, he was a Moor, who was NEVER, EVER, a slave in the first place (See the Sundry Free Moors Case, attached below). The tables seem to be turned at this time, yet, the pendulum always swings back the other way, and “cause and effect” is always in effect.
    Moors obligation to others, and others obligation to Moors, is outlined in the Treaty Of Peace and Friendship. The Treaty and the Constitution for the United States of North America Republic, are equally valid today. One cannot be acknowledged without the other. The Treaty is written perpetually, but is to be revisited every 50 years for any adjustments, or amendments. It was revisited in 1836, the only change was those who were present, as the Sultan had passed form, and his Son was present on his behalf. It has not been revisited since then, as those who would Treat of it, believe (by way of false teachings), that they have nothing to do with it, and that they are descendants of negros, coloreds, blacks, afro-americans, african americans, etc. The European Colonist, who needed to preserve the Treaty for their own safety and protection, can now bury it and pretend it doesn’t exist. They act and speak for Moors because those brand names are chattel property, and fictitious corporate entities that have no rights to secure. This is why in Court they want you to have someone else speak for you, and then they “sentence you” (a phrase of words).
    Those who think they are negro, colored, black, afro-american, african-american victims of slavery, usually begin their history on slave boats from Africa. Subsequently they also end their history there as well, because it’s origin and nature does not allow for anyone to honestly trace their history beyond that period. As soon as one goes past the 17th century, prior to those brands, they enter immediately into Moorish History, all over the World. .
    It is a necessity to establish rules of Law, particularly for the uncivilized, for the purposes of maintaining civilization. These Ancient Laws are derived from the Matriarchal, Natural Law, for commonality of all. This is why the Constitution on one hand, is referred to as one of the oldest and ancient documents, and on the other hand, people think it came about only for and by the European Colonist, ratified in 1791. The Priniciples of Civilization are Ancient, and many have stood for the preservation of them. Downright murder and theft holds no candle to morals, ethics and truth. Destruction of the Libraries, burning of the books, have left a seemingly clean slate to introduce mis-information, and that is exactly what happened. The Reconstruction Era, is a more recent demonstration of re-constructing the literature, and preparing for a mis-education. This is why one will find that older writings have the greatest appeal. .
    The principles of Civilization are Ancient, and thus “We The People of the United States” (of which there are many), adopted this Constitution for the United States of America, as stated in the Preamble. Everyone is endowed by their CREATOR, with certain unalienable rights of birth (birthrights), which cannot be bought, sold, or transferred, nor can the exercising of them be made void, or turned into a crime. The Constitution protects preserves, and secures those unaienable rights, and, guarantees a republican (Matriarchal) form of government. Anything outside of that, has no standing.
    It is a travesty when the civilization principles which established the rules of engagement (government) are not honored by those who say they are the Mothers and Fathers of Civilization, as they are the very ones (descendants) who established and authorized, by way of writing them (Writ), and securing these principles as the “Supreme Law Of The Land”. Failure to acknowledge and honor your own unalienable rights, allows for others to violate them, and has caused great degradation to man and mankind. This continued dishonor can only be rectified by the originators, the aboriginal and indigenous people of the planet, who have a RESPONSIBILITY and OBLIGATION!
    The following is a definition of “free white person”. Knowing that the Aboriginal people of Europe, of the planet for that matter, are Moors, will help one to gain understanding as to why Moors claim “free white persons”, from a lawful standpoint, as it is not an identification from a pedigree standpoint. It is a legal status terminology. Hopefully it will put an end to any confusion regarding “free white persons”. (Read “Ancient and Modern Britons” by David MacRitchie, Volume I and Volume II).

    The Following is the Definition of Moor:

    Now take a look at the PDF below wherein we have extracted, from the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, Article 6, 11, 21, and the additional article and sign-off indicating “Moors”, thus there is no mistake as to the parties involved, and their responsibilities and obligations, and the actions to be taken upon their encounters.
    AS FOR THOSE WHO THINK THE TREATY WAS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN ARABIC, AND THEN TRANSLATED: THAT IS AN ERROR ON THEIR PART BECAUSE: The Treaty was translated at the time it was written!, as is indicated in the Treaty itself.
    The word Moslem / Muslim, is synonymous with Moor. This is one of the important things to know in doing your research. They will, in fact, use the Word Moor, and then in the same, sometimes sentence, certainly paragraph, they will use Moslem, just as they use the word Christian and Crusader, which are also the same. This is true and indicative throughout older writings, and it is most necessary to know, along with many other names for Moors, such as Ottomons, Turks, Almoravhides, Almohades, Saracenes, just to name a few.
    Proven Fact: Moors Heritage and History goes back as far as (not limited) to Freising, Germany. The Moors head appears on the Pope’s Coat Of Arms – today! As well it is cut into the lawn at St. Peter’s Bascilica in Rome. Anytime you see in the writings “possibly ancient”, you can be assured there may not be much said, because the “modern man”, integrated into the human bouquet, is not ancient, thus he either doesn’t know, or doesn’t want to tell, because he may not want you to know, as has been in the past, however, in the recent, and the now, truth of information is flowing freely, because this is the unstoppable “age of information”, or age of knowing”, the energy which is described to you in the “sign” of Aquarius, the humanitarian, of which the time is now to bring the people back into the human family, and concerns of humanity are abound.

    Here sits “The Pope” , who came to New York — the Empire State, and sat under the MoorsHead, while those who are descendants of Moors, debate as to the impacting validity of the honor of THEIR direct ancestors.
    One can resist this, however upon a “real” challenge”, which means “study”, those who try to prove facts wrong, will find that they are proving them to be correct.. Their personal acceptance is based on their willingess to take responsibility, and recognize their obligation. This is important for the future of the progeny, as the children will be left to fend for themselves without the benefit of truth of self. How can one stand as a “man or wombman’, without knowing who they are, and knowing the blood of their ancestors, that continues, and will continue, to run through them, which make up who they are?
    It is best advised, that we study to know these things and stop the attempts to discredit our foremothers and fathers., thus “take our place, amongst the affairs of men”.
    Now Read the Letter from George Washington to the Sultan of Morocco, dated 1789 in New York, the Empire State, indicative of the fact that this (North America) is the Moroccan Empire. not to be confused with the Moroccan Kingdom. A Kingdom is subordinate to an Empire. It also proves the obligation of the newly formed “United States of America” to the Moroccan Empire. Be mindful that the Preamble, states: This Constitution is ordained for the United States of America by “We The People of the United States, two different entities, yet indivisible and stands under the Republic — not the Democracy. (The democracy has no backing, no guarantee of unalienabale rights, no immunities, no standing at Law, etc.)
    Are You a Free Moor, or Are You a Negro Slave? Read the PDF below, “The Sundry Free Moor” Case (Law) outcome, from the Journal of The House Of Representatives in South Carolina. It clearly explains the distinction.

    It is important at this time, to Read Article VI of “The Constitution For The United States of North America” (1791). It is self explanatory that all contracts, debts, agreements, etc. entered into prior to it, are valid against the United States Constitution as well as the Confederation.
    Article VI:
    All debts contracted and engagements entered into before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
    This Constitution, and the laws of the United States wihch shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding..
    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. .
    After the death of Sidi Mahomet; Emperor of Morocco, the United States of America was very concerned as to whether the Emperor’s Son; Muley Soliman, would continue to honor the Treaty. There is much correspondence recorded in the Congressional records, which reflect their concerns.
    The PDF below contains such correspondence from Congressional Record No. 107, 4th Congress, 1st Session, 1795 A.D.
    Now Read Resolution # 75, (below PDF), out of Journal Of Representatives in Philadelphia. Keep in mind Philadelphia was the first Capitol for the United States of America, as taught in public school. After Benjamin Bannekar designed the “White House” in D.C., the Capitol was moved there. Moors have sufficient documented proof of who they are, and who they are not. Those Moors in Philadelphia don’t have to go very far to reference an acknowledgement recorded in 1933.

    Depending on How You Answer the question: (Are You a Free Moor or a Negro Slave?), you might want to know more (Moor) truth about who you are, as documented / recorded in history. You will find, in the the PDF below, the Preface of the book “The Story Of The Moors In Spain”, (written by Stanley Lane-Poole), very enlightening, uplifting, validating; and hopefully inspirational enough to help shift you into the “responsibility and obligation” state of mind, which is necessary to redeem yourself, your children, and humanity.
    This Page was inspired by, and researched by, David Sinclair Bey, who has also provided in the below PDF, information regarding the Conceptual Origins of the Constitution For the United States North America Republic, which was written in the Ancient Spirit of Divine Law, thus it is a Divine and Spiritual Document.
    Are any of your fore-mothers or fore-fathers Moors?
    Consider the following:
    · You have two (2) parents 2^1 2 raised to the 1st power
    · You have four (4) grand parents 2^2 2 raised to the 2nd power
    · You have eight (8) great grand parents 2^3 2 raised to the 3rd power
    · You have sixteen (16) great, great grand parents 2^4 2 raised to the 4th power
    · Go back one-hundred (100) generations: 2^100 2 raised to the 100th power.
    2^100 = 1,267,650,600,228,230,000,000,000,000,000
    . This is the number of people it takes to make YOU.
    If you do not believe that any of your foremothers or fathers are Moors, then the information regarding the Treaty and its obligations does not apply to you. As it was done in trust based upon issues and names formed by their forefathers.

    Some History of the Concept Origins of The Constitution
    By David Sinclair Bey
    The reason why the Constitution for the United States of North America Republic has 7 Articles,
    which govern the Trinity of the, Executive powers, the Legislative powers and the Judicial powers
    is because it was adapted from the principles of 7:
    The 7 Days of the Week:
    • Sunday (Sun) • Monday( Moon) • Tuesday (Mars) • Wednesday( Mercury) • Thursday (Jupiter)
    • Friday (Venus) • Saturday (Saturn).
    The 7 Cardinal Colors:
    •Violet •Indigo •Blue •Green •Yellow •Orange •Red.
    The 7 Chakras:
    •The Crown Chakra •The Brow Chakra •The Throat Chakra •The Heart Chakra
    •The Solar Plexus Chakra, •The Sacral Chakra • The Base Chakra.
    The 7 Key Notes in the Musical Scale:
    •A •B •C •D •E •F •G.
    The 7 Seas:
    •Black Sea •Caspian Sea •Persian Gulf •Red Sea •Mediterranean Sea •Adriatic Sea •Arabian Sea.
    The 7 Continents:
    •Africa •Antarctica •Asia •Australia •Europe •North America •South America.
    The 7 Virtues:
    •Faith •Hope •Charity •Strength •Prudence •Temperance •Justice.
    The 7 Deadly Sins:
    •Pride •Avarice •Luxury •Wrath •Idleness •Gluttony •Envy.
    The 7 Liberal Arts:
    •Grammar •Logic •Rhetoric •Arithmetic •Geometry •Astronomy •Music.
    In the development of Man: (after the 7 stages of development in the womb, and then birth):
    • the first seven years is the Age of Reason (7),
    • the second seven years is the Age of Puberty (14),
    • the third seven is the Age of Maturity (21)
    The principles of ‘7”, were created by the Grand Architects of the Universe, when she divided her 28
    day cycle into 4 equal parts of 7 each. The 28 day cycle of the moon is within her.
    These are the principles of the “7” that operate civilization. The framers of the Constitution
    adapted the principles of the circle, or cycle of seven, and agreed to operate under these principles, in
    harmony with Nature.

    Mr. WITKIN, Mr. Speaker, I desire at this time to call up Resolution No. 75,
    Printer’s No. 1034.
    The Resolution was read by the Clerk as follows:
    In the House of Representatives, April 17, 1933. Many sons and daughters of
    that proud and handsome race which inspired the architecture of Northern Africa
    and carried
    into Spain the influence of its artistic temperaments have become citizens of
    this Nation.
    In the City of Philadelphia there exists a Moorish-American Society made up of
    Moors who have found here the end of their quest for a home and of the children
    of those who journeyed here from the plains of Morocco.
    This Society has done much to bring about a thorough absorption by these
    people of those principles which are necessary to make them good American
    citizens. These Moorish-Americans have since being here missed the use of
    the titles and name annexations that were so familiar at home and which are
    used in accordance with the doctrines of the religious faith to which they are adherents
    therefore be it, Resolved That this House commends the Moorish-
    American Society of Philadelphia for the efficient service it has rendered the
    Nation in bringing about a speedy and thorough Americanization of these former
    Moors and that in accordance with the fullest right of religious independence
    guaranteed every citizen we recognize also the right of these people to
    use the name affixes El or Ali or Bey or any other prefix or suffix to which they
    have heretofore been accustomed to use or which they may hereafter acquire
    the right to use.
    On the question, Will the House Adopt the resolution?
    It was Adopted May 4,1933

    The State Records of South Carolina
    Journals of the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 1789-1790 MICHAEL E.
    STEVENS, Editor, CHRISTINE M. ALLEN, Assistant Editor Published for the
    South Carolina Department of Archives and History by the University of South
    Carolina Press Columbia, SC 8557 Copyright ©1984 by the South Carolina
    Department of Archives and History First Edition Published in Columbia, SC by
    the University of South Carolina Press Manufactured in the United States of
    America ISBN 0-87249-944-8 20 JANUARY 1790 (page) 363 (continued from
    previous page) thereto, Our Committee are Mr. Hugh Rutledge, Major Pinckney &
    Mr. Deas. House Journal 4 January 1790- 20 January 1790.
    A petition was presented to the House from Sundry Free Moors, Subjects of the Emperor
    of Morocco; and residents in this State, praying that in case they should Commit
    Any Fault amenable to be brought to Justice, that they as Subjects to a Prince in Alliance
    with the United States of America, may be tried under the same Laws as the Citizens
    of this State would be liable to be tried, and not under the Negro Act, which was
    received and read.
    [The humble Petition of Francis, Daniel, Hammond and Samuel, (Free Moors) in behalf
    of themselves and their wives Fatima, Flora, Sarah and Clarinda, Humbly Sheweth That
    your Petitioners some years past had the misfortune while fighting in the defence of
    their Country, to be captured with their wives and made prisoners of War by one of the
    Kings of Africa. That a certain Captain Clark had them delivered to him on a promise
    that they should be redeemed by the Emperor of Moroccan Ambassador then residing
    in England, in order to have them returned to their own Country: Instead of which he
    brought them to this State, and sold them for slaves. Since that period they have by the
    greatest industry been enabled to purchase their freedom from their respective Masters:
    And now prayeth your Honorable House, That as free born subjects of a Prince now in
    Alliance with these United States; that they may not be considered as subject to a
    Law of this State (now in force) called the negro law: but if they should unfortunately
    be guilty of any crime or misdemeanor against the Laws of the Land, that they may
    have a just trial by a Lawful Jury. And your Petitioners as in duty bound will ever pray.]
    1 Ordered That it be referred to a Committee, the following Gentlemen were accordingly
    appointed, Mr. Justice Grimke, General Pinckney & Mr. Edward Rutledge.
    Mr. Edwd. Rutledge reported from the Committee to whom was referred the petition of
    the Free Moors, which he read in his place and afterwards delivered it in at the Clerks
    Table where it was again read for information. Ordered That it be taken into immediate
    Consideration which being read through was agreed to and is as follows Viz. Report
    That they have Considered the same and are of opinion that no Law of this State can
    in its Construction or Operation apply to them, and that persons who were Subjects
    of the Emperor of Morocco being Free in this State are not triable by the Law for the
    better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and other Slaves. Resolved That this
    House do agree with the Report.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Taz Goes Big With A New Daily Show!
Popeyes Crash Your House!

Watch & Listen